Not at all. That's not an option.
That doesn't change. Our yellow trucks aren't going anywhere. If a tree limb falls on a line, a yellow truck will be there. Winnetka will maintain its electric distribution system within the village as it always has.
Nothing. Though that plant now only operates a few days a year, it too isn't going anywhere.
Winnetka has relied on an outside provider for over 30 years--the Illinois Municipal Electric Agency (IMEA). But in more recent years, there are now more providers that do the same thing without relying as heavily on coal.
PJM and Winnetka's in-house electric department are responsible for reliability, not IMEA.
Winnetka has many options for selling our power to the market, and we should use a competitive process to find the best deal.
We are talking about the contract with IMEA, not the physics of the energy electrons that reach our homes. Our contract and our money fund two massive coal plants.
This is speculative, and a perfect example of a collective action problem.
It's folly to believe IMEA will not make any capital investments in 2035 or later that will require new debt.
Alternative power suppliers offer full requirements contracts just like IMEA—or we can add staff for certain services.
Not true. Coal is increasingly uneconomic compared to cleantech costs. Write's Law: cleantech costs fall by 20% with every doubling of deployment.
The plan lacks data and forecasting typically used by the utility industry. The contract has zero performance guarantees or cancellation policies if Net Zero fails to happen.